◦ ARCHIVE INDEX — browse every page
Red's Army

Would you swap Crowder or Bradley and BKN pick for LaMarcus Aldridge?

lma

Ronald Cortes/Getty Images

Jackie MacMullan ignited a firestorm of controversy with her comments that LaMarcus Aldridge is not happy with the Spurs and vice versa. The league is now buzzing with LMA trade speculation. Naturally, the Celtics are part of that speculation:

If the Spurs were to consider trading Aldridge, you would have to move him to a team looking to compete right now. Chicago would be a natural fit, but they are short on players with impact and upside; Wade and Rondo wouldn’t interest the Spurs and the Bulls wouldn’t want to add Aldridge while losing Jimmy Butler in the deal. They have some good young pieces but no star material. The Heat might consider it, but would have to deal Goran Dragic and Justise Winslow, for starters.

The Celtics would be a natural fit, as Aldridge would be worth losing Avery Bradley or Jae Crowder along with the Nets pick for, and would make them a serious force in the East with LMA next to Al Horford. Horford’s old team might consider moving Paul Millsap (whom they nearly traded this summer) for Aldridge to pair with Dwight Howard. And the Raptors would definitely want in on the conversation.

If the Spurs were open to dealing him, they would have a lot of offers. But that’s a long way off. For now, there’s too much to just ignore with Aldridge. It might be fine, and blow over, but there’s at least some smoke and a few sparks with this situation, it’s reasonable to assume.

Avery Bradley or Jae Crowder and the Nets #1 pick for LaMarcus Aldridge? Call me crazy but I’m not sold on the idea.

I don’t think pairing another over-30 big man with Al Horford is the smart, long-term play. I also don’t think LMA is good enough to get us past Cleveland and into the finals.

And, we all should have serious concerns about the circumstances that would make San Antonio – one of the best run teams in the league – trade a prized free-agent after one season.

Like this Article? Share it!

  • Wootay

    NO a big fat NO

  • RedsLoveChild

    If Aldridge were 27 years old {instead of 31}….that`s an easy “yes”.

    Now? Better off listening to other offers.

    • art

      NO. Aldridge is not the defensive rebounder that we should ever chase no matter what his age. If the Spurs don’t want him, there’s a reason for that. Maybe if he was a free agent but no pursuit further than that. PASS.

      • Sean

        Chasing defensive rebounders in 2016 ain’t in the master plan.

        • art

          Oh it’s in the master plan. This team is in desperate need of a big time rebounder. Don’t know about 2016 but it’s in the long term plan.

          • Curt Hays

            The team is in need of improved FG% ten times more than anything else.

          • art

            It starts with a bigger team that can score in the post. Higher percentage shots down low is what is lacking. Just a scorer is not enough. The need is size, defense, rebounding, and low post scoring that comes with it. This team is one of the smallest in the NBA. Not gonna cut it.

    • Curt Hays

      To quote my comment above: The NBA Trade Machine even says that AB, Bae, and Jerebko for LMA would result in +2 Wins for the Cs and -10 Wins for the Spurs.

    • Curt Hays

      Compared to AB and Jae combined, LMA socres more of the following stats, per game: points, blocks, and rebounds.

      Compared to AB and Jae individually, LMA dishes more assists than either of the other two, grabs about the same number of steals, has a comparable eFG%, and has a higher FT%. Per 100 possessions, LMA has both higher offensive and defensive ratings, though Jae is very close to him on both.

      However, Jae has just begun his rise, LMA is on his way out, Jae is healthier, all around, faster on fast breaks, AND as @zippittyay:disqus already asked, “What can he do that Horford doesn’t already do better for us?”

      LMA vs Horford (per 36 minutes):

      1-year age difference
      Al is a far better shooter at all ranges except for the charity stripe.
      Al attempts 4 fewer shots and scores 4 fewer points.
      Al is a much better 3P shooter, but he really shouldn’t take many.
      LMA gets to the line more.
      Al is a better rebounder.
      Al dishes more assists, grabs more steals, and makes more blocks.
      LMA has a higher PER and more win shares.

      Al has a much higher VORP (value over replacement player), more win shares per 48 minutes, a much higher +/-, and far more playoff games under his belt.

      I LOVE YOU, AL HORFORD.

  • jrleftfoot

    hellllll to the no

  • Frank Aziza

    Not that BKN PICK

  • Pingback: Boston Celtics Daily Links 10/19/16 | The Full Court Press()

  • Dave

    Bradley and Crowder are about to enter their prime and you throw in a pretty much bonafide lottery pick from Brooklyn? No thanks.

  • art

    No f-ing way. The writer has gotta be on some hallucinogen. And for the 10 zillionth time, the BKN picks are 10,000% OFF LIMITS!

    • Curt Hays

      I agree, but Jackie isn’t crazy though. The NBA Trade Machine even says that AB, Bae, and Jerebko for LMA would result in +2 Wins for the Cs and -10 Wins for the Spurs.

      • art

        I could care less about a theoretical +2 wins when what really matters are the rings that Aldridge would be unable to deliver.

  • Sean McLaughlin

    Not to mention that the Spurs’ and Celtics’ systems are VERY similar. We’d have to see exactly why there’s a rift there. If it’s just about playing time on his end, not the end of the world. If he’s having trouble adapting to their system, Hell to the NO. Having said that, the Brooklyn pick is worth more than a 30yo all star that hasn’t made the leap to Super star yet. If not by now, I don’t see it happening.

  • zippittyay

    What can he do that Horford doesn’t already do better for us?

    • Curt Hays

      This is the best possible response.

  • Sean

    Jaesus will be better this year then LMA ever was.

  • IanD

    To get the Celtics to the next level we need an elite SCORING 2 or 3. Any thing short of that doesn’t get us to that next level. We can’t seriously compete till there is someone that can go Toe to Toe with Curry, Lebron, Durrant, Westbrook, etc. No team has won the championship in the past 25 years (outside of the Pistons) without serious future Hall of Famers on their team.

    Aldredge is not that player, he’s a very good player but that role (and cap room) is filled by Horford. Pass

    • art

      I disagree with all of you when all you want to bring up is scoring. Although no elite scorer, there are plenty of scorers already on the roster including everyone’s favorite at 5 feet 8 inches. We need an elite defender, rebounder, rim protector Kevin Garnett style player. That’s what wins titles. Defense is number one. Aldridge fails that test.