◦ ARCHIVE INDEX — browse every page
Red's Army

Your Morning Dump… Where what if Jaylen Brown was playing in the Olympics right now?

jaylen brown

Every morning, we compile the links of the day and dump them here… highlighting the bigstory line. Because there’s nothing quite as satisfying as a good morning dump.

Team USA is undefeated in international play since 2004, using NBA stars to restore order and dominance. And it appears that this Olympic tournament field in Rio is so weak that the United States will coast again. So we thought to ourselves, what if a team of college players and incoming NBA players were created to compete in the tournament? Who would play on that team? And would they medal? The Globe put together a 12-man team to compete in these Games:

Jaylen Brown — Perhaps the most explosive player in the draft, the Celtics rookie would give Team USA a scoring small forward with an edge. Of course, Brown would struggle attacking the basket as he did in the Pac-12, where he picked up a plethora of charging calls. He would have to temper those drives.

Globe – Sunday Notes

This may sound sacrilegious and a bit anti-nationalist, but Team USA basketball just doesn’t really get me that excited. The men’s national team, save for 2004, just feels like the male, national version of UConn women’s basketball. Even when they struggle, they’re not going to lose, and if they do, like they almost have twice in this Olympics, shame on them.  I feel conflicted watching these guys every year– I have to pull for Kobe Bryant or Carmelo Anthony to win a gold medal for my country? I’d much rather channel my patriotism towards the athletes in other events– the women and men I don’t cheer against throughout the year and who aren’t such clear cut favorites to romp over the competition.

With that said, I would completely change my philosophy if basketball in the olympics were played by a 22 and under team, specifically with guys who have no NBA experience. Yes, the quality of play would go down, and yes, the USA might lose a game, or two, or the whole damn tournament, but I would tune in, without fail, and cheer like crazy for the young guys.

Gary Washburn outlines his entire Team USA if the tournament was played this way, and so let’s go with his squad that includes new Celtics rookie Jaylen Brown. As a Celtics fan, I would be glued to my TV for every game. For Brown, it would be a chance to continue to sharpen his game as he heads into his rookie season in Boston. It would also be an increased injury risk, though, and an additional load to an already grueling first year in the NBA.  But, what a way to start of your pro career– with the chance to bring home a gold medal in a highly competitive international tournament.

Not sure about all of you guys, but count me in.

On page 2, Isaiah continues the NBA tradition of trolling kids at camps

Caption contest: “Hey, Isaiah! Pick on someone your own… oh, wait…”

Like this Article? Share it!

  • Curt Hays

    I actually don’t think basketball should be in the Olympics. It’s a sport dominated by one country. It just doesn’t make sense.

    • Finks

      I disagree, and I think the Gassol brothers, the Aussies and Canadians would as well. At the very least, the Dream Team is 100% responsible for every foreign player in the NBA right now.

      • Curt Hays

        Argentina is the only team to win gold since Pros were allowed to play. That includes none of the countries you mentioned. Maybe Spain is happy winning the Silver every year, though they won’t be winning any more for a while now.

        To me, including basketball is as biased as it would be to include American Football.

        • CallingBatman

          I’m still trying to figure how how curling became an Olympic sport. Or what’s so athletic about the equestrian events, at least for the human riding the horse.

          • Curt Hays

            At least mastery of riding a horse was beneficial in battle at some point in the past.

            In regards to Winter Olympics…that’s why they call them “games”.

        • Mike C

          We could send some of our professional boxers to the Olympic’s while were at it. I’m sure they could dominate the sport for the next couple decades. Allowing professional athletes to represent the United States was an absolutely horrible decision, in my opinion.

          • Curt Hays

            UNLESS…we send them in a sport they don’t get paid for. Maybe like sending Aaron Gordon to the high jump.

          • RedsLoveChild

            After losing the gold in 1988, nothing wrong with sending the 1992 US Dream Team to the Olympics to remind the world who invented basketball.

            However, it should have been a “one-shot” deal only.

            Back to amateurs again in 1996.

  • Mike C

    Literally, no one cares if the United States wins another gold medal in basketball. The Olymics should be about amateur athlete’s period! At least then when a gold medal was won, it would actually mean something.

  • Peter Lemaire

    Ironically, the United States voted against adding professional players. Also, an interesting factoid from that article is that it was just NBA players who weren’t allowed to compete. Players from other international leagues were allowed in the Olympics. People always blame the US for ruining Olympic basketball when we voted against the measure.

    http://archive.usab.com/history/why_can_pros_compete.html