◦ ARCHIVE INDEX — browse every page
Red's Army

Your Morning Dump… Where Jae Crowder was kind of a jerk

04152010

Every morning, we compile the links of the day and dump them here… highlighting the big story line. Because there’s nothing quite as satisfying as a good morning dump.

Crowder got into shoving matches. He cussed out teammates. He argued with coaches. “Anything you could think of,” he said, “I was doing it. All the knucklehead stuff.” The outbursts weren’t occasional, either.

“He was fighting us every day,” Williams said. “I was fighting him every day.”

Butler, a senior, considered himself the team leader. Crowder clashed with him, too.

MassLive

Jay King with sort of a “part two” to Adam Himmelsbach’s piece on Crowder that ran on Thursday. This one has a fair bit of background on Crowder’s rather circuitous route to from junior college to a starting gig in Boston.

SPOILERS: There are no cute baby pics.

Page 2: Meet Evan Turner

Could it be that Turner, too, had to stop thinking of himself as that No. 2 pick in 2010?

“I’d really like to believe that,” said Darius. “Evan really had a hard knock against him because of that No. 2 thing. But he’s greatly improved in a lot of ways. I’ve seen it in the way he prepares for games and the way he is with the media. He’s better dealing with the media.

“The change in the situation has helped him as well,” he said. “The Celtics like him for his work ethic. They like that he’s a gym rat who just loves the game of basketball.”

Boston Herald

Mark Murphy was not going to be outdone by King and Himmelsbach this week. Click above to read about the life and times of Evan Turner, the Celtics’ premier wit and suddenly a valuable cog in an improbable collection of draft picks and factory seconds.

Seriously. Take a moment and look at the Celtics’ roster and how it was assembled:

G: Isaiah Thomas – Boston sent Phoenix the 27th pick in the draft + Marcus Thornton
G: Avery Bradley – drafted
SF: Jae Crowder – ‘throw-in’ in the Rondo trade
PF: Sullinger – drafted
C: Amir Johnson – free agent
G: Marcus Smart – drafted
G/SF: Evan Turner – bargain basement free agent signing (seriously, he didn’t even get the full mid-level exception)
SF/PF: Jonas Jerebko – salary filler in the Tayshaun Prince trade
PF/C: Kelly Olynyk – drafted
C: Tyler Zeller – salary filler in the Cavs/Paul Pierce trade exception deal

With the sole exception of the Isaiah Thomas deal, every player on this roster that Boston traded for ended up here either because Boston was facilitating another team’s plans (Cleveland signing Lebron), or because the other team thought they were getting a better player (Rondo to Dallas, Prince to Detroit). Evan Turner had been given up for dead after a disastrous stint in Pacerland. I don’t know if this team was assembled by Danny Ainge or Emma Lazarus.

Page 3: Where the Celtics are ready for the playoffs this time (we hope)

“Last year you didn’t know what to expect, I mean I didn’t, I’d never been to the playoffs. I didn’t know what it was like other than watching it on TV,”

MassLive

Just a reminder where the Celtics were in terms of playoff experience last year.

Also, as Jay King tweeted after posting links to that article, even though the Celtics are, superficially, much the same as they were at the start of last season’s playoffs, a lot has also changed. Sullinger is healthy, Crowder is starting, and Tyler Zeller’s coming off the bench.

Yes, Atlanta is a good team, but even with their health and experience handicaps last year, the Celtics were competitive with a better Cavs team, and they have improved more year over year than the Hawks have (if anything the Hawks have regressed somewhat). It’s going to be a tough series, but I give the C’s a decent shot at pulling off the (mild) upset.

Finally: The greatest game ever played

Cowens is asked whether Game 5 was the best basketball game he ever played in.

COWENS: [Deadpan.] No. Because I fouled out.

HEINSOHN: When it was over, Jo Jo laid down on the floor and couldn’t get up again. He gave it everything he had.

Boston.com

This has been a truly awesome week for Celtics coverage. Chad Finn’s article is spiced up with archival footage that almost makes it feel like you were there! If, as family snap shots and grainy videos tell me, the 70s were blurry and out of focus most of the time.

The rest of the links:

MassLive: Brad Stevens: Brooklyn Nets wise to hire Ronald Nored, former Boston Celtics assistant, as D-League coach | Isaiah Thomas writes essay on how he couldn’t believe how much Celtics fans loved him – and how much he’d love BostonNBA Draft tiebreakers: Boston Celtics win one, finish third in another

Boston Herald: Murphy: Who has the edge in Celtics-Hawks series?  | Jae Crowder has faith in his ankle for playoffs | Bulpett: What is Celtics’ ceiling in these playoffs?

Boston.com: NBA Eastern Conference playoff preview: The Celtics have a shot  | Isaiah Thomas is even shorter than his official height

Boston Globe: Underdog Celtics gearing up for red-hot Hawks

ESPN Boston: Isaiah Thomas knows he must stand tall for Celtics to excel in playoffs

CSNNE: Consider Thomas’ Players’ Tribune letter a strong pitch | Consider Thomas’ Players’ Tribune letter a strong pitch

PS: Read that Players’ Tribune piece. Especially if your name is Kevin Durant.

Like this Article? Share it!

  • RedsLoveChild

    First half of the `70`s was awesome…dominated by NY, LA, MILW, BST

    Second half of the `70`s was abysmal…the above teams were in the toilet, fan interest was non-existent, finals were shown on taped delay.

    • art

      Bill Walton and the Portland title. Elvin Hayes and the Bullets title. Dennis Johnson and the Supersonics title. I don’t see why that was awful. Awful for who?

      • RedsLoveChild

        It was awful for me.
        Plus, given that fan interest was at such an all-time low that the finals were shown only on taped delay….I`d say it was pretty awful for tens of millions of others!

        First half of the 1970`s….LA was winning 69 in a season, Boston with 68, Milwaukee with 66, NY with 60, etc.

        Last half of the 1970`s :

        You enjoyed seeing Washington win the title with 44 regular season wins?
        Led by Hayes/Unseld who were both well past their prime?

        You enjoyed seeing that 52 win Seattle team win a title?

        You thought Portland was great, with their 49 wins? Walton still missed 20% of their games, in what was considered a “healthy” year for him.

        C`mon Art…..three champs with an average record of 48-34?

        • art

          For you to judge titles because of the regular season record is beyond ludicrous. There’s no relationship. Regular season vs.playoffs: two different animals. According to you, we should cancel the playoffs and award the team with the best regular season record the title. And I suppose you found 1969 very awful when the Boston Celtics won the title after finishing the regular season in 4th place at 48-34. I don’t ever enjoy a team that doesn’t wear the Green uniform win a title, but that doesn’t make the NBA awful. Nor is it awful when a team doesn’t have a spectacular regular season, then rises up when it really counts. Then it’s called admiration.

          • RedsLoveChild

            Explain why CBS yanked live coverage of the finals.

          • art

            I think you’re mistaken. I had to research. “From 1975 to 1979, CBS aired all NBA Finals games live (usually during the afternoon);” You also need to research this. There were tape delay games, but not the Finals.

          • RedsLoveChild

            Here`s what you need to research :

            http://www.classictvsports.com/the-nba-on-cbs-late-night-and-tape-delay

            For instance, Magic Johnson`s famous Game 6 vs. 76`ers, to win the 1980 championship, was seen LIVE ONLY in LA and PHILA.

            {I saw it live only because I was in LA at the time}

          • art

            As I already researched, the ’75 through ’79 Finals were all live tv. Yeah I do agree that the NBA wasn’t as popular then compared to what it later became. There was also concern about televising games in May tv sweeps periods causing the networks to do what they could to not interfere with those times. The Finals would eventually become a June event because of that. But just because the NBA wasn’t as popular back then doesn’t make it an awful time.
            As for 1969, Russell and his team had just won 10 of the last 12 titles. They knew how to win and what it took to win. That’s what made them a great team. I strongly disagree with you on that. Yes, maybe they struggled during the regular season because of age, but when the bell rang, Russell and his teammates answered the bell. They rose to the occasion. And the rest is history. Just ask Faker fans. About those balloons.

          • RedsLoveChild

            When it comes to the CBS taped delay issues of the late `70`s-early `80`s…it might be best if we simply “agree to disagree”. We clearly have different recollections and sources.

            Same should be said about how “impressive or unimpressive” those Portland, Seattle, Washington teams were that won championships during that era. Again, we are not in agreement there.

            1969 Celtics? The LAST thing I would ever do is disparage one of my fondest sports memories ever. Winning the way they did, after having been written off due to age, is one of the greatest NBA feats ever.

            I remember it all like it happened last week, particularly that live Monday night broadcast of Game 7 on ABC, with Chris Schenkle & Jack Twyman……the 100-85 Celtic lead becoming a 103-102 lead with 2 minutes to go, Wilt`s injury with 5:45 to go, West scoring 42 with a bandaged leg, Nelson`s shot with 1:17 to go, the rafter balloons, the USC marching band, etc. Did I miss anything?

            Russell was smart to quit when he did. It solidified his legend like nothing else could have.

            To me, the `69 Celts pulled off a “great and stunning accomplishment over a one month period”.

            However, when it comes to evaluating the “greatest teams of all-time”, I simply cannot include a team that wins just 48 games…or 44 games like Washington, or 49 games like Portland, or 52 games like Seattle.

          • art

            Nobody is saying those teams are the greatest all-time. But you’re putting too much weight on regular season success when age, injury, trades, and other events occur during the long NBA season. Nothing is ever awful about winning a title regardless of your regular season record or anything else that occurred during the long season. That’s why they have the playoffs. Countless top-of-the-standings regular season teams have failed come playoff time.

          • RedsLoveChild

            What made the `69 Celtic title so special/legendary is because they were no longer a great team. They limped into the playoffs, barely qualifying. Havlicek was the only one who was not way past his prime.

            In 1977-78-79, games were played, somebody had to win the titles, it happened to be Portland-Washington-Seattle.

            All 3 were “nothing” teams. They all beat “nothing” teams in the playoffs. They all disappeared quickly, never to be heard from again.

          • art

            Disagree. The ’69 C’s were a great team that was running out of gas, as evidence, Russell and Sam Jones retired. Seattle and Washington played each other 2 Finals in a row. They were great teams during that time. Don’t understand why you call them “nothing” teams. We can go up and down both rosters and point out many great players including Dennis Johnson. Same for Bill Walton, Lionel Hollins, Dave Twardzik, etc. for Portland. That also was a great team. Your views are really off-base sir.

          • RedsLoveChild

            Hollins, Twardzik…don`t forget the legendary Larry Steele.

            Great teams? You set the bar very low, Sir.