◦ ARCHIVE INDEX — browse every page
Red's Army

Report: Celts wouldn’t trade Crowder for Butler

jae-crowder-jimmy-butler

Remember the trade deadline in February, when Danny Ainge said he “came close” to making a trade but didn’t? And remember that so many Celtics fans were relieved because we wanted to keep budding star Jae Crowder?

That may have been a rare case when Danny and the fans were thinking alike. That’s if a report out of Chicago today is accurate:

Of the eight playoff teams, each of them have at least three impact players in their prime or at least giving “prime” production. These Bulls have just one, essentially in Jimmy Butler. […]

Yes, the Bulls did inquire to a couple teams at the trade deadline about Butler and Rose, along with Pau Gasol, league sources tell CSNChicago.com. They had preliminary discussions with the Orlando Magic and Boston Celtics, but when the Celtics wouldn’t put promising forward Jae Crowder in their package of picks and players, there was no realistic possibility of a trade.

Surely the discussion was not a one-for-one deal, Crowder for the All-Star Butler. The Bulls would’ve been asking for much more than that. But if a trade had been completed, Butler would’ve replaced Crowder at small forward in the Boston lineup. The question then is, does Ainge value Jae more than Jimmy? Or was the package Chicago wanted just too rich to begin with? We may never know.

What we do know is that, with Chicago missing the playoffs, speculation will continue about trading Butler and perhaps Derrick Rose, to reboot the Bulls’ roster. The Cs may thus still have a shot at Butler in the off-season, especially once the position of the Nets draft pick is known. A No. 1 choice would be a powerful asset in trade talks for any available star.

By the way, the Draft Lottery is scheduled for May 17.

Related: MassLiveBoston Celtics trade rumors 2016: Team wouldn’t put Jae Crowder in Jimmy Butler talks

Like this Article? Share it!

  • art

    Given the age of the number 1 choice and the age of the C’s roster, there is no established star on Earth that is worth the number one pick. Why doesn’t Reds Army ever bring up the arsenal of draft picks that the C’s own other than the Brooklyn picks? The Brooklyn picks are the future of this team. Plus the free agent possibilities that may land the established star. No need to make foolish trades to land a guy like Butler who does not fill what the C’s are in dire need of.

    • Vivek Vikram

      I like your conservative thinking. I think we should get the draft picks and build them into longer run than looking to trade it up.

    • IanD

      I think that is a bit of hyperbole. I can think of many current players I would trade the #1 pick this year for no question.

      1. Steph Curry
      2. Anthony Davis
      3. Kowhi Leonard
      4. Kevin Durant
      5. Russell Westbrook
      6. LeBron James
      7. Andrew Wiggins

      Do you honestly think Ingram or Simmons will be better then any of those above, even if they are already older? No way

      • art

        No but just as good. As for the older guys that are in free agency stage (James and Durant), no way would you trade for them when they can be signed as free agents. The only player on that list I would trade for is possibly Anthony Davis, but even he is an injury-prone question mark. The C’s do not need guards nor any smaller players at this point in their history. Let’s bring the inside power game back to the game of basketball and to hell with the 3’s.

  • RedsLoveChild

    There is no way on earth they would trade away the #1 pick. Same is true if they wind up with the #2 pick in the draft.

    If the pick falls outside the top 2, they`ll start listening to offers.

  • stephen

    I dont see crowder getting much better, maybe a little bit as a spot up shooter. But with that being said, i would never trade him. He is such a complete player, you dont trade him unless its in a package for one the best players in the leauge. Jimmy buttler is far from that, would love to have him, just not fot crowder. If things are really as bad as they say, hopefully they would take AB, sully/KO and the mavs pick or ours, or both. If we get top two definatly keeping pick. 3rd pick, definatly keeping unless it gets traded for a star or for a real defensive big stud.

    • Curt Hays

      Mark Cuban didn’t see him getting better either. That’s why he traded the guy for Rondo. Have faith, man!

      • stephen

        Cuban loved the guy. He thought he was going to be a steal when drafting him and he was showing potential in dallas. He thought rondo would put him over the top, gambled and lost. To bad we didnt get to keep powell tho

        • Curt Hays

          Powell is excelling under Carlisle. Probably wouldn’t have with this Celtics team. Singe just doesn’t build a team based on bugs. Since the days of Chris Wilcox, we’ve been a different club.

          • stephen

            For crowder, cuban drafted him based off analytics. Thought he would go top 20’s and went later. Main reason he went so low is because of his age and years in college. I think powell wouldve had a 40/60 chance in boston. At the time i just didnt see the time he would get over our useless bigs like sully and ko. Boy how both have changed my mind. Still not too big on sully but really like him, but i do think one of them has to go. Preferrably sully. Only in a deal tho, just not one thats a latterale move.