◦ ARCHIVE INDEX — browse every page
Red's Army

Your Morning Dump… Where the Cavs are the champs. What does it mean for the Cs?

17481817-standard

Every morning, we compile the links of the day and dump them here… highlighting the big story line. Because there’s nothing quite as satisfying as a good morning dump.

Teams will call about Love, and the Cavaliers will listen, because that’s what teams do. But in the afterglow of an unprecedented Finals comeback, they justifiably exuded hope that this sometimes awkward nucleus could get even better — and more importantly, that LeBron might share in that hope.

“This team did not fit particularly well for playing Golden State, and that’s my fault,” Griffin said. “But against the East, we were historically good. Now that we’ve experienced this, I’m very confident this group has its best basketball in front of it. They know what they have now.”

Most of all, they have LeBron. He is the Eastern Conference power structure at this point.

ESPN – Cavs slog through  doubt and rise to the title

While the Cavs and Warriors were tied in total points through six games of the 2016 NBA Finals, the series was missing and fans were yearning for an elusive close game. The two teams delivered with one of the more anxiety-ridden, plot-twisting, edge-of-your-seat basketball games in recent memory. When the dust settled (dust… definitely not confetti) at Oracle Arena, Lebron James, Kyrie Irving and the Cavs quenched the thirst that accompanies a 52-year championship drought in the city of Cleveland. Whatever you believe about Lebron James, this was a legacy-sealing, championship run.

So, what does it mean for the Celtics? As David Griffin hints and Zach Lowe echoes above, the Eastern Conference is the Cleveland Cavaliers and everybody else. Really, it’s Lebron James and everybody else and it has been since 2011. Vegas currently has the Cavs at 5-2 to win the championship again next year as the only Eastern Conference team with single digit odds of doing so.

The next best odds in the east? Your Boston Celtics.

One thing is for certain, these odds are always, and will especially this summer be fluid. The Cs 20-1 odds will improve if Danny Ainge lands a superstar this off-season and will fall if he does not while other eastern teams improve. The Celtics, though like everyone else in the east, are chasing Cleveland, and will be chasing the Cavs so long as Lebron James is playing basketball at a high level.

This Cavs team isn’t unbeatable, though, as the Warriors proved by coming within one game (and possibly one Draymond Green baby-maker shot) of vanquishing Lebron in five paltry games. Those Vegas odds show five Western Conference squads with higher odds than the Celtics, which is just another way of demonstrating what is glaringly obvious in the NBA — the upper-class of the West is far and away stronger than the upper class in the East. If one Eastern Conference team can do enough to join Cleveland, that team gets closer to the NBA Finals than three of those Western Conference behemoths. Danny Ainge has plenty of arguments he can attempt to make to persuade an elite player to join the Cs in free agency, but the chance to improve those already decent championship odds by coming to the Eastern Conference has to be near the top of his arsenal.

On page 2, how do you feel about Okafor without giving up number three?

Sixers send:Jahlil Okafor, Nik Stauskas, Carl Landry and picks Nos. 24 and No. 26
Celtics send: Avery Bradley, Terry Rozier, R.J. Hunter and picks Nos. 16 and No. 23

[…]

Why the Celtics do it: The Celtics get a big man they’ve liked a lot in Okafor without having to give up the No. 3 pick or core young players Marcus Smartand Kelly Olynyk. Okafor immediately helps them in the middle, and the Celtics can replace Bradley with the No. 3 pick — whether that turns out to be Kris Dunn or Jamal Murray.

ESPN – NBA draft trades we’d love to see

If Chad Ford were running the Celtics, either D’Angelo Russell or Jahlil Okafor would be in green by now and RJ Hunter would be out of here on two separate occasions.

With the third pick not exactly blowing other teams away, and with the Cs having had ample time to hone in on and fall for one or two of the prospect group that follows Ben Simmons and Brandon Ingram, it’s the Celtics that might have to be blown away in order to move on from the three spot.

Okafor was originally mentioned in trade rumors to Boston involving a straight up swap with the Celtics’ number three pick. Those rumors have cooled significantly as the flaws in Okafor’s game, plus his immaturity have prevailed over his scoring and upside. In this scenario, the Cs can keep the pick and still get a low-post scoring threat. A deal involving either Bradley or Smart (and in this case, Rozier as well) makes sense only if the apple of Danny Ainge’s eye is Kris Dunn. Dunn has the potential to, not so far down the line, do similar things as Bradley and/or Smart. If Ainge is smitten, might as well dislodge the clogged drain of guards in the Cs back-court, make a move for a scoring big, and draft a guard in the mold of either of the guys you ship out to get him.

These hypothetical trades never come to fruition, but count me among those who likes this sort of move if, in fact, Ainge wants to draft Kris Dunn.

And finally, the man knows only how to tell The Truth

 

You want to make this NBA Finals about Lebron winning one for Cleveland, or the Warriors inability to clinch “Greatest Team Ever” status? That’s all well and good, but this NBA Finals was all about Paul Pierce’s breakout performance as an analyst!

Jokes aside, Pierce did an excellent job and fit in naturally with ESPN’s pre/post-game crew. When Pierce hangs them up, he should have a network job waiting for him if he wants it.

The rest of the links:

CSNNE – James and Cavaliers win thrilling NBA Finals

Herald – Celtics have mixed history when choosing early  | Countdown to the draft: Point Guards

 

Like this Article? Share it!

  • art

    Congrats to Cleveland. This was a victory for Eastern basketball. Take away the difference in 3’s, and the Warriors got 9 extra points they didn’t deserve. The Cavs were able to make up for it from the free throw line. The true score of this game was 87- 74 Cavs. I’m going to call it the U3 score, the undeserved 3 score. It will show how the 3’s are destroying the NBA game.

    • Dave

      Not to mention GS beat the 95-96 Bulls regular season record but completely choked away a 3-1 series lead in route to losing on their home floor in game 7. Congrats to the Cavs, they deserved it, they prevented GS from succeeding the 95-96 Bulls and prevented a repeat as well. GS has been rubbed in our faces the past 2 years and a lot of their bandwagon fans don’t help either so this is refreshing.

    • BamaCeltic

      You really make no sense with all your anti 3’s mumbo jumbo …Shooting the ball is a skill …HELLO ?? 9 extra points they didnt deserve ???? How is that ? They shot it from deep , which is hard and it went in …hence 3pts ?? Its an easy concept. Also ..as a Celtics fan , you might remember a player by the name of LARRY BIRD ?? He is considered one of the greatest shooters of all time and he def used the 3pt shot to win many games for the Celtics….so I’d take that into consideration when bashing the 3pt shot.

      • art

        There are a lot of shots that are hard that aren’t awarded 3 points. And making a play to get someone open close-in can be a lot harder than someone standing at the 3 point line waiting for a pass. Distance shooting is just one single skill. It doesn’t deserve more credit than every other skill.

        • RedsLoveChild

          My only complaint with the 3 is the current “over-reliance” of it.
          Today`s game is largely a 3-point shooting contest, where 3 guys are usually camping out on the line.
          The entire success of GS is their ability to shoot 3`s, otherwise they are an average team at best.

          • NE_Celt

            Live by the 3, die by the 3….GSW be dead.

          • BamaCeltic

            I see what your saying RLC , but if it works and you get wins , is it wrong ? For better or worse its an evolution of the game. NBA aside , overall I’m glad its putting more emphasis on shooting period for the game of basketball. I think that GSW , Curry in particular has shown kids you don’t have to be a physical beast to do well in the game of Basketball. If you can handle the ball and shoot that thang ….you too can be a Superstar and a league MVP..and for kids to see that is awesome.

          • RedsLoveChild

            I`m all in favor of whatever works.
            Certainly there`s a place for the 3-ball. It`s a matter of style preference.

            At best, too much 3-ball gives the NBA a little too much of the European look…at worst, too much 3-ball might as well be the ancient two hand set shot of 1950`s.

            Personally, I love seeing strong defensive rebounds…quick outlet passes…fast breaks…easy hoops.
            As well as crashing the offensive boards…quick put backs.

          • Glas

            3 is more than 2 got GS the best regular season record. 3 is more than 2, but 2 is more than 0 lost GS the Finals.
            their unwillingness to just get the ball through the hoop and get 2 to break Cleveland’s runs, and instead taking long, contested 3’s, lost them these last 3 games.
            Harrison Barnes should also be ashamed to show his face in the GS club house. if he had not played marginally better in game 7 he would deserve a beating, figuratively speaking.

          • Curt Hays

            I don’t really have a complaint against the 3-point shot being overused…however, GSW’s reliance on it is the main reason that I’m happy about Cleveland winning. 🙂

          • RedsLoveChild

            Main reasons I`m happy the Cavs won :

            1} 1973 Celts no longer have the distinction of winning the most regular seasons games {68} w/o winning the ring

            2} Ayesha Curry {looks like hubby was in on the “fix” the way so many of his 3 point attempts failed to draw iron}

            3} Draymond Green {kick guys in the nuts, karma will come calling}

          • Curt Hays

            I actually got to the point that I wanted see Draymond lose more than I wanted JR Smith to lose.

            Also, it makes the BYE AYESHA t-shirts so much funnier.

          • forever_green

            You guys have lost IT!.. You can never want someone to lose more than LeBron & JR Smith!

          • Curt Hays

            Yes, Draymond Green. He’s a huge tool. 🙂

        • BamaCeltic

          Does being a 7 footer and standing on the block with your hand up any different than standing on the 3pt line waiting on a pass ? I don’t think so… However you can be a 7 footer and make it to the NBA based on being a 7 footer with potential …unFAB Melo comes to mind , but if your a 6foot nothing guard who can drain 3’s and that’s it …you wont even come close to making the league …so lets drop that these guys who can drain 3’s are a one trick pony. It might be there best attribute but they are more complete basketball players than a lot of the walking stiffs that make it to the league based on there height and potential…Try again…

    • zippittyay

      I’ll take watching someone hit a 3 pointer over stopping the game to shoot 2 FTs any day of the week, thank you.

  • adam

    I hate the Cavs, but I have to give respect when it is due. Congrats to that team for coming back and winning. Shame on Green for being selfish and giving out nut shots. Yes, Bogurt was injured, but they could have played through it. I guess this means Love won’t be coming to the Celtics after all. Oh shucks!.

  • Astarot

    There are two problems with this Okafor scenario: 1. He’s not what Cs need inside (rim protection) 2. I’d still take Bender with 3rd pick anyway (unless he sucks mightily during workouts and his stocks drop dramatically till Thursday) due to the biggest upside and potential to be rim protectior and overall all- around big man (not one dimensional). In that case you’d have to look for Bradley replacement on the market and I’m not sure you want to waste time and money doing that.

    • Glas

      I am not entirely on the Okafor train by any means, but he would provide some scoring that we need. hoping Mickey could be the defender next to him.
      Danny will take the best player available at 3, not pick to fill a need, as he should. if that is Bender, great. he took Rozier last year because he thought he was the best available. he will take Dunn/Murray/etc. this year if he thinks the same. and he should. we can hope that Brad has enough input to stop Danny from making any more “Fab Melo” picks (which Might be what taking Bender could amount to).

      • Astarot

        It could be Fab Melo like pick but he could also be the best player available simple as that. I’m pretty sure Bender needs a lot of development but I think as of right now he’s the best as a 3rd pick. Agree Ainge should take the best player but I also think he should pick based on a upside. It’s a gamble a big gamble but Draft it’s more or less a big gamble anyway. As far as Okafor deal what I meant was that if you trade (read you’re giving up assets) you should look for more of a all around big man. Sure Okafor could be better every year but if that’s the case then I’m more wiling to develop Bender basally from scratches.

  • Rick Rice

    No AB trade! Please. Period.

    • Glas

      while I mostly agree with your sentiment, if we are ever going to trade him now is likely as good a time as ever. his 1st team all-defense and decent scoring this year have his value as high as it has been, and who can say about the future. Danny will not trade him for a bag of balls. it took Big Al, plus, to bring KG to town. if Danny can turn AB, plus, into a similar deal it will be hard to argue, if it turns into another ring.

  • swissflix

    Since when is Kelly Olynyk a core player?