◦ ARCHIVE INDEX — browse every page
Red's Army

NBA to experiment with 44-minute Celtics preseason game

celtics timeout

The NBA announced today that the October 19th Celtics-Nets preseason game will be four-minutes shorter than the standard NBA game.

Application of the experimental 44-minute game will involve quarters being reduced from their typical 12 minutes each to 11 and a reduction in mandatory timeouts in the second and fourth quarters. During this 44-minute game, each quarter will feature two mandatory timeouts per quarter, with the first triggered at the first dead ball under 6:59 of the period if neither team has taken a timeout prior, and the second mandatory timeout will be triggered by the first dead ball under 2:59 if neither team has taken a timeout subsequent to the first mandatory timeout. In the NBA’s 48-minute game, the second and fourth quarters have three mandatory timeouts.

The standard, regulation NBA game runs about two-and-a-half hours, which I think is pretty good.  Fans spend the better part of an hour watching the action… they get to take an intermission… and then there’s another hour or so of action and that’s it.  I like that flow.  The flow is good.

A nationally televised game is a different story.  Timeouts are longer, and there are more of them.  A nationally televised game can run about 15 minutes longer than normal, which is a noticeable difference.  THAT’S where regular fans tend to have a problem.

If the NBA wants to look into how its time outs are used, I’m all for it.  Limit the number of timeouts at the end of games. Limit the crazy amount of substitutions that are allowed (it drives me nuts when one coach subs someone in, and the other coach says “oh crap” and pulls a guy quickly off the bench to match up.  If you’re not at the table ready to check-in, you’re not in the game).  The last two minutes of close games can be an incessant, mind-numbing parade of stoppages.  Let the guys figure it out on the court.

But don’t eliminate actual game play.  If there’s anything that’s going to piss off the consumer, it’s eliminating actual basketball in favor of keeping commercials in these national games.  We’re not paying all this money for tickets, concessions, or League Pass to see less basketball… even if it is just a minute a quarter.  We’re not paying for special sports cable packages because we want more ads for crappy lite beers.

This experiment is fine as a one-off thing.  But rest assured that if the determination is less basketball is the way to go to shorten games, there will be a backlash.

Like this Article? Share it!

  • chuckmckenney

    I agree with John 100%. But I’m pissed off that they are even trying this gimmick. Slap a god damn logo a jersey before you start altering the game.

  • KGino

    What the HELL is this?! I want my 4 minutes of Celtics Basketball back. This is BS! Someone slap Adam Silver for me

  • Bayern

    in future news NBA will experiment with 35 second shot clock

    • adam

      -_- o_O

  • NE_Celt

    Oh no they didant! Seriously… Cutting out 4 min of basketball, and for what, more adds and money in their pockets! The NBA has gotten way to involved in the money aspect and it’s going to start killing the game… It’s sad. And if they really want to cut time, how about we put a limit on those ref reviews, God almighty, those can last 4 minutes themselves!

  • jrleftfoot

    the only thing I disagree with in the article is the idea that coaches shouldn`t be allowed to make resposive substitutions. really. I guess baseball managers shouldn`t be allowed to put in their lefty specialists against lefthanded pinchhitters and football coaches shouldn`t be allowed to send in a different defensive package when offensive substitutions are made.

    • jrleftfoot

      responsive–website wouldn`t let me correct this

  • mfleuren

    To be honest, this is in response to complaints that the league has kept adding games, without lengthening the season, which results in all the back-to-backs we always hear about and increased injury potential. They also lengthened the all-star break without lengthening the season, which made things worse. The alternative to shortened games would simply be less games (if they don’t lengthen the season), which I think we can all agree is even worse if our principal complaint is that they shouldn’t be taking away basketball. Not saying this is the best solution, I hate all the stoppages too and they can definitely be curtailed, but it wont solve the initial problem of overworked players. Just saying we should keep an open mind.

    • dk

      agreed–the real issue is the season–they could and should shorten it 4-6 games to eliminate the “schedule losses” and back to-back- backs, and guys getting run down and injured which results in an inferior product being put on the court because you have teams resting starts ala spurs etc.

  • Pingback: Recap: Jared “Lovenger” leads C’s comeback win in Brooklyn | Red's Army - The Voice of Boston Celtics Fans()

  • Pingback: NBA Celtics Fan | Recap: Jared “Lovenger” leads C’s comeback win in Brooklyn()