Taking Stock: Celtics – Hawks | Red's Army - The Voice of Boston Celtics Fans
Red's Army

Taking Stock: Celtics – Hawks

John - Red's Army (@RedsArmy_John) March 20, 2012 Uncategorized 8 Comments on Taking Stock: Celtics – Hawks

Taking stock

After every game, we'll take stock of how each individual performance affects the player's overall value.


Sideways_double_arrowRajon Rondo:  He shot 4-14.  All four of those shots were lay ups, making him 0-7 from 3 feet and out.  He did have 13 assists and 6 steals.  And that alley oop fake to KG/pass to Ray for 3 was sold perfectly.   

 Sideways_double_arrowPaul Pierce:  Did Paul Pierce say something about David Stern recently that I missed?  He almost fouled out of two straight games now.  It's hard to blame the guy for a bad shooting night (4-14) when he can't get into any rhythm.  

Green arrowRay Allen:  19 points on 9 shots is pretty great, and he was pretty much THE reason the Celtics went on that big run to end the 3rd/start the 4th.    

Green arrowKevin Garnett:  I'll take 16/8 out of him, especially when you look at the defensive job he did on Josh Smith.  Of course, Josh helped by not being aggressive at all, but the few times he did attack, KG did a good job of making it difficult.

Green arrowBrandon Bass:  He only had 8 points, but he only took 7 shots had 10 rebounds.  He was playing tough out there and with an edge.  I like that out of him.   


Sideways_double_arrowAvery Bradley: 10 largely uneventful minutes.

Red arrowKeyon Dooling:  Still kinda waiting on Keyon to do something.  It'd be really nice to see him contribute something.

Green arrowMickael Pietrus:  Stepped in nicely for a foul-plagued Paul Pierce.  His bomb early in the fourth looked like it was going to be a knockout blow. The 6 rebounds are very nice too.

Green arrow

Greg Stiemsma:  Love the four blocked shots.  He's another that seems to be playing with a little bit of an edge.  I think Stiemsma is benefiting from the added time and the veteran tutelage. 

Sideways_double_arrowJaJuan Johnson, Marquis Daniels, Sasha Pavlovic, E'Twaun Moore 


Sideways_double_arrowDoc Rivers:  I got one big problem with this Celtics offense.  When the C's have a lead late in the game, the C's offense completely changes to Paul Pierce at the top of the key and Rondo off in the middle of nowhere.  I know, I know… don't give all that crap about Rondo's jumper and free throws.  Give Rondo the ball, set picks for one another, and let Rondo find Pierce on the wing somewhere.  If Pierce has to create or run a pick and roll with KG from there, then fine.  But RUN THE DAMN OFFENSE FIRST.  I'm sick of the Celtics changing things in the fourth quarter and watching leads slip away because they're trying to run 15 seconds off the clock and then do something.  It's just not working.  Pierce and KG aren't what they used to be, even though they can still be quite effective.  When teams snuff out that first option after winding the clock down, it leads to desperate passes and turnovers.  Enough with this already.


Green arrowIt was horrible to watch.  The first three quarter were abysmal.  But this is the lockout-shortened debacle of a season and this was time zone #3 in a long road trip.  The Celtics overcame their malaise and won a game against a team ahead of them in the standings.  That's the important thing to focus on. 

Like this Article? Share it!

  • paul

    Give me a break. You rip Rondo for his shooting. Really? How many times has Pierce shot his way to 20 points the ugly way? Every other night? Whether you want to acknowledge it or not, we NEED Rondo shooting, because even if he ‘s missing, he still breaks down the defense when he is aggressive. Do you really not see how important that is? Really? When Rondo isn’t aggressive, we end up circling around chucking Js. His penetration is the ingredient that gives our offense energy.
    On top of that, the rest of Rondo’s game was strong last night. He controlled Teague. He gave us 6 steals, including some key ones, and he ran the team well, which is why he ended up with 13 assists on a night when no one could hit anything. He played a strong all around game, but folks find something to rip him for every single night. I don’t have a problem with that, because he is our best player and de facto leader, but what grills me about it is that no one ever acknowledges that context. The reason a player is held under such freaking intense scrutiny is that he is that important to the team.
    Rondo had a fine game. Geez, usually folks rightly scream when an opposing pg goes off on him. But he gets no credit when he controls them, like the top defensive pg in the league should.

  • KY Celts fan

    can you ever post on here without bitching about something?

  • Mike

    acknowledging the fact that rondo shot 4-14 is ripping him?


  • Rondo To KG

    Nice paragraph on Doc, but you forgot the part where he doesn’t play our rookies on a tough road trip where our starters are forced to play nearly 40 MPG. I get it, the rookies will make mistakes. Will it really hurt this team to give Johnson/Moore 5-7 minutes a game?

  • George

    Paul has a better FG% and FT% than Rondo. No one rips him for how he runs the offense, it’s simply his shooting that is his problem.

  • Quest

    agree with your comments on Doc

  • Watching Dooling get lit up by Jerry Effing Stackhouse was especially painful while Pavlovich and Moore are glued to the bench. Dooling is the worst player in green I have seen in a decade.