Red's Army

Breaking: Chris Paul to Lakers?

RedsArmyAdmin December 8, 2011 Uncategorized 8 Comments

According to Woj, he's going for Bynum and Odom. 

I guess that means no pursuit of Chris Paul.  And it leaves the Lakers pretty soft in the middle.  There's got to be more to this deal, right?

And I guess that means Rondo is sticking around.  I'm kind of OK with all of this at the moment.


Ok, so they keep Bynum. That puts a lot of scoring pressure on him down low, but still… better deal, I think.  Unless LA still thinks it can get Dwight Howard

Like this Article? Share it!

  • http://profile.typepad.com/6p01157053529f970b zippittyay


  • http://profile.typepad.com/michaelflanagan Michael Flanagan

    I was VERY against the proposed Rondo deal, but I’m starting to think this is worse. Now they have Bynum and anyone else but Kobe as trade chips for Howard. At least we know Lebron will never win a title now.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/danmcdonald Danno

    Only in the NBA can you trade an oft-injured midget for a Spanish Llama and the Ugly Kardashian.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/brandonat1899 Rondo To KG

    Now they have CP3 and they might have the pieces to trade for Howard. Thank god for the lockout bringing us parity!

  • http://profile.typepad.com/danmcdonald Danno

    I don’t see how they have any pieces left to trade for Howard. They would have to trade like 4 guys to equal his salary.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/celticfan822 Nick

    Lakers just went from best to about 5th or 6th in the West. When Bynum undoubtedly gets hurt again they';; have paul and kobe Ugh awful awful trade for the lakers

  • http://profile.typepad.com/6p01157053529f970b zippittyay

    I concur.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/thetitleisours Thetitleisours Mkay

    I agree relying on Bynum is like us trying to rely on Shaq last year